Crypto Trading Fee Calculator
Calculate Your Trading Fees
Compare fees across exchanges based on your trade size and order type.
Select trade details to see fee calculations.
How This Compares to Nanu Exchange
Nanu Exchange offered competitive fees (0.15% maker / 0.25% taker) but operated with low liquidity (daily volume < 1 BTC) and no regulatory protection. Major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase offer higher liquidity and compliance safeguards despite higher fees in some cases.
Looking for a straight‑to‑the‑point Nanu Exchange review? You probably want to know whether the platform was safe, cheap, and worth the hassle before it vanished in late 2020. Below you’ll get the facts - from fee tables to user complaints - so you can decide if the Nanu story matters for your own crypto journey.
Quick Takeaways
- Nanu Exchange operated from 2017 to November 2020, focusing on Brazil’s crypto market.
- Maker‑taker fees were 0.15% / 0.25%, matching industry averages.
- Daily Bitcoin volume never reached 1BTC, far below major exchanges.
- Trust scores from BeInCrypto hovered around the low‑300s, indicating limited reliability.
- Closure was abrupt, with no official explanation; users were left without support.
What Was Nanu Exchange?
Nanu Exchange was a centralized cryptocurrency exchange launched in 2017 and registered in Brazil. It offered a web‑based trading interface that let Brazilian users buy, sell, and withdraw a handful of digital assets. The platform ceased operations in November2020, and its website now displays a generic “Taboo” page, confirming the shutdown.
Trading Offerings and Liquidity
The exchange supported six main coins: Bitcoin (BTC), BTC, Ethereum (ETH), ETH, Litecoin (LTC), XRP, Tron (TRX) and Dogecoin (DOGE). Bitcoin accounted for 47% of the platform’s 24‑hour volume, but the total daily volume was only about 0.98BTC - a fraction of the thousands of BTC traded on Binance or Coinbase each day. Low liquidity meant slippage could spike for larger orders, a common complaint among active traders.
Fee Structure and Withdrawal Costs
According to data from Cryptowisser, Nanu’s maker fee was 0.15% and the taker fee 0.25%, which sits comfortably within the industry median. Bitcoin withdrawals incurred a flat fee of 0.0008BTC - essentially the global average of 0.000812BTC per transaction.
Trust Score and Market Position
BeInCrypto assigned Nanu a trust score of 3 and placed it at rank 596 (later slipping to 764) out of over 2,000 surveyed exchanges. CoinMarketCap listed the platform as an “Untracked Listing,” signalling that public volume data were not reliably reported. Compared with heavyweight exchanges that register daily Bitcoin volumes in the high‑three‑digit BTC range, Nanu’s sub‑1BTC flow highlighted its niche, low‑profile status.
User Experience and Support
Community feedback on Revain and other forums painted a bleak picture. Users reported a clunky interface, “poor navigation,” and a “low‑liquidity” environment that made price discovery difficult. Customer support appeared virtually nonexistent; no positive anecdotes surfaced in the available reviews. One reviewer even saw the landing page replaced with the word “Taboo” weeks before the official shutdown, suggesting technical neglect.
How Nanu Stacked Up Against the Big Players
| Metric | Nanu Exchange | Binance | Coinbase | Kraken |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daily BTC Volume | ≈0.98BTC | ≈3,200BTC | ≈1,800BTC | ≈1,200BTC |
| Maker Fee | 0.15% | 0.10% (standard) | 0.00%‑0.50% | 0.16%‑0.26% |
| Taker Fee | 0.25% | 0.10%‑0.20% | 0.50%‑1.50% | 0.26%‑0.36% |
| Trust Score (BeInCrypto) | 3 (rank ~600) | 9 (rank 1) | 8 (rank 3) | 8 (rank 5) |
| Regulatory Status | Unregulated (Brazil) | Registered in multiple jurisdictions | US‑regulated | EU‑registered |
The table makes it clear: Nanu’s fee levels were decent, but its liquidity, trust rating, and regulatory backing were far behind the market leaders.
Why Did Nanu Shut Down?
No official statement explained the closure, but analysts point to three converging pressures. First, Brazil’s regulatory climate tightened in 2020, forcing many local platforms to tighten KYC/AML practices - something Nanu never fully disclosed. Second, its low daily volume meant it could not compete for market‑making contracts, leading to widening spreads and higher trading costs for users. Third, technical neglect (the “Taboo” page) hinted at operational cash‑flow problems, which likely made continued service unsustainable.
Lessons for Traders and Investors
When evaluating any exchange, especially regional ones, keep an eye on three pillars: liquidity, regulatory compliance, and transparent reporting. A platform may offer attractive fees, but if daily volume sits under 1BTC, price slippage can erode any cost advantage. Regulatory registration provides a safety net for user funds; unregulated sites can disappear without warning, as Nanu demonstrated.
Where to Go Next - Alternatives for Former Nanu Users
- Mercado Bitcoin - Brazil’s largest local exchange, with robust KYC, high liquidity, and a mobile app.
- Foxbit - Another domestic player offering fiat‑BRL pairs and 24/7 support.
- Binance - International platform with dedicated BRL trading pairs and deep order books.
- Coinbase - US‑regulated, good for beginners, accepts Brazilian users via credit‑card purchases.
- Kraken - Known for strong security and a growing BRL gateway.
Switching to a platform with proven volume and regulatory standing reduces the risk of sudden shutdowns and improves trade execution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nanu Exchange still operational?
No. The service stopped accepting trades and withdrew its website in November2020, and there have been no announcements of a relaunch.
What were the main fees on Nanu Exchange?
Maker fees were 0.15% and taker fees 0.25%. Bitcoin withdrawals cost a flat 0.0008BTC, which matched the global average at the time.
How did Nanu’s liquidity compare to bigger exchanges?
Its daily Bitcoin volume hovered under 1BTC, whereas major platforms trade thousands of BTC each day. This low liquidity led to higher slippage for larger orders.
Was Nanu regulated in Brazil?
No. Nanu operated as an unregulated exchange, which contributed to trust‑score concerns and increased risk for users.
Which exchange should I use if I’m based in Brazil?
Consider local platforms such as Mercado Bitcoin or Foxbit for BRL‑centric trading, or international options like Binance and Kraken that offer deep liquidity and compliance safeguards.
In short, Nanu Exchange served a specific niche at a time when Brazil’s crypto market was still maturing, but its lack of liquidity, limited regulatory footing, and abrupt shutdown make it a cautionary tale. If you’re hunting for a reliable venue today, aim for an exchange that checks the three boxes of volume, compliance, and transparent reporting.
1 Responses
Hey folks, looks like Nanu tried to be the underdog in a market full of giants. Their fee structure was decent, but liquidity is the lifeblood of any exchange. When you can’t fill orders, those low fees become just a nice idea. Think of it like a coach who offers cheap training but no equipment – you’ll struggle to improve. It’s a reminder that trust scores need real volume behind them. Keep your eyes on both price and depth, and you’ll dodge the pitfalls that Nanu fell into.