Mining Pool Payout Calculator
Estimated Daily Earnings
Pay-Per-Share (PPS)
0.0000 BTC/day
2-5% feePredictable, instant payouts
Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares (PPLNS)
0.0000 BTC/day
0.5-1% feeLower fees, variable income
Proportional (PROP)
0.0000 BTC/day
0-1% feeSimple, proportional payouts
Solo Mining
0.0000 BTC/day
0% feeFull reward, high risk
Key Takeaways
- Rewards are split based on shares-cryptographic proofs that prove work even if they don’t meet network difficulty.
- Pay‑Per‑Share (PPS) offers instant, predictable payouts but comes with higher fees.
- Pay‑Per‑Last‑N‑Shares (PPLNS) rewards long‑term loyalty and can boost earnings when the pool is lucky.
- Proportional (PROP) ties payouts directly to the exact share contribution for each mined block.
- Solo mining keeps the whole block reward but is risky and requires substantial hardware.
When you join a mining pool a collective of miners that merge their hashpower to increase the odds of finding a block, the big question is how you actually get paid. The answer boils down to a handful of reward‑sharing schemes that have evolved alongside Bitcoin’s rising difficulty. In this guide we’ll break down each method, show you the math behind the payouts, and help you decide which style matches your risk tolerance and cash‑flow needs.
What Is a Share and Why Does It Matter?
Before diving into the payout models, you need to understand the building block of every pool: the share a proof‑of‑work solution that meets the pool’s lower difficulty target rather than the full network difficulty. Miners submit shares every few seconds; each share proves they’ve performed a certain amount of work. Even though a share doesn’t win a block, the pool can count it as a unit of contribution.
Because shares are generated at a predictable rate, pools can estimate each miner’s share of the eventual block reward. Think of shares like tickets in a lottery: the more tickets you hold, the larger slice of the prize when the pool finally wins.
Reward‑Sharing Methods at a Glance
All modern Bitcoin pools use one of four main schemes. Some pools even let you toggle between them, but each has a distinct risk/reward profile.
Pay‑Per‑Share (PPS)
The Pay‑Per‑Share (PPS) a payout system that pays miners a fixed amount for every valid share submitted, regardless of whether the pool finds a block is the most newcomer‑friendly option. As soon as your miner reports a share, the pool credits you with a pre‑calculated amount, typically expressed in satoshis per share.
Because the pool must honor every share, it assumes all the risk. If the pool goes a day without finding a block, you still get paid, and the operator eats the loss. To stay profitable, PPS pools charge higher fees-often 2‑5% of the payout.
Advantages:
- Stable daily income; you can predict cash flow.
- Easy budgeting for electricity and hardware costs.
- No need to monitor pool “luck” or block frequency.
Drawbacks:
- Higher fee percentages cut into profits.
- Most PPS pools ignore transaction fees, so you miss out on that extra revenue.
Pay‑Per‑Last‑N‑Shares (PPLNS)
The Pay‑Per‑Last‑N‑Shares (PPLNS) a payout method that distributes rewards based on the number of shares a miner contributed during the last N shares of the pool’s mining history was designed to punish “pool hopping.” Instead of paying per share, the pool looks at a sliding window of the most recent shares (often the last few thousand). When a block is finally found, the reward is split proportionally among everyone who contributed shares inside that window.
Because payouts depend on actual block discovery, earnings can swing wildly day‑to‑day. If the pool mines three blocks in a day, you could see a big spike; if it mines none, you get zero.
Advantages:
- Lower pool fees (usually 0.5‑1%) since the operator’s risk is limited.
- Encourages long‑term loyalty; steady miners see smoother long‑term returns.
Drawbacks:
- Income volatility-harder to budget for.
- New miners may wait weeks before seeing meaningful payouts.
Proportional (PROP)
In a Proportional (PROP) reward system that distributes a mined block’s reward among miners in proportion to the shares they submitted for that specific block, the pool only pays out when it actually finds a block. If you contributed 10% of the shares that led to the block, you get 10% of the block reward (including any applicable transaction fees).
This method directly ties your earnings to the block you helped discover, which feels fair but also makes your income highly erratic.
Advantages:
- Simple math-your payout equals your share percentage of the winning round.
- Often the lowest fee structure because the pool’s risk is minimal.
Drawbacks:
- Big swings in daily earnings; a dry spell can mean zero income.
- Encourages pool hopping if miners chase pools that just mined a block.
Solo Mining
The Solo mining an approach where a miner works alone and keeps the entire block reward plus transaction fees if they find a block is the purest form of mining. No pool, no middleman-just you, your hardware, and the network.
Solo miners enjoy the full block reward the 3.125BTC currently granted for each mined Bitcoin block, plus any transaction fees. However, the odds of finding a block solo are astronomically low unless you have massive hashpower, typically measured in dozens of terahashes per second (TH/s) for Bitcoin.
Advantages:
- All the reward goes to you-no fees, no sharing.
- Absolute control over mining strategy and software.
Drawbacks:
- Highly unpredictable cash flow; you may go weeks without a single payout.
- Requires top‑tier hardware, often ASIC miners specialized chips built solely for Bitcoin proof‑of‑work, delivering terahashes of hashing power, and large electricity budgets.

Side‑by‑Side Comparison
Method | When you get paid | Income stability | Typical fee | Best for |
---|---|---|---|---|
PPS | Every valid share | High (predictable) | 2‑5% | Miners who need steady cash flow |
PPLNS | When the pool finds a block | Medium (variable) | 0.5‑1% | Long‑term miners willing to ride variance |
PROP | Only on block discovery | Low (high variance) | 0‑1% | Miners who want simple proportional payouts |
Solo | Only when you find a block | Very low (rare) | 0% | Large operations with massive hashpower |
How to Pick the Right Payout Scheme
Start by answering three personal questions:
- Do I need a predictable paycheck for covering electricity and rent?
- How much hardware do I control-does my hashpower rival a small pool?
- Am I comfortable watching my earnings swing day‑to‑day?
If the answer to #1 is “yes,” PPS is likely your safest bet, even with the extra fee. If #2 is “no” but you have a modest rig you plan to run for months, PPLNS gives lower fees and rewards loyalty. If you love watching the pool’s luck chart and don’t mind occasional zero‑day earnings, PROP is the simplest. Only consider solo mining if you’re running several TH/s of ASICs and can afford long periods of no income.
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Pool hopping-jumping between pools to chase the highest short‑term payout-can ruin your long‑term returns. PPLNS was built to penalize this behavior, so stick with one pool for at least a week before judging its performance.
Beware of hidden fees. Some pools advertise “0% fee” but charge a higher variance fee baked into the payout calculation. Always read the pool’s fee schedule before signing up.
Don’t forget transaction fees. PPS pools often ignore them, while PROP and PPLNS include them in the total reward pool. If transaction fees are high (e.g., during network congestion), the extra income can be significant.
Wrapping Up
Understanding how mining pool rewards are shared lets you align your mining operation with your financial goals. Whether you crave steady income, low fees, or the thrill of a big occasional payout, there’s a method that fits.

Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the main difference between PPS and PPLNS?
PPS pays you for every share you submit, so you get a predictable daily amount. PPLNS only pays when the pool actually finds a block, and the payout is based on the shares you contributed during the last N shares, which leads to higher variance but lower fees.
Can I switch payout methods after joining a pool?
Many modern pools let you toggle between PPS, PPLNS, and PROP in your account settings. However, you’ll usually have to wait for the current payout cycle to finish before the new method takes effect.
Do I need ASIC hardware to join a pool?
For Bitcoin mining, ASICs dominate because they provide the necessary terahash‑per‑second performance. GPUs can be used for other coins, but most Bitcoin pools require a minimum hash rate that only ASICs can reliably meet.
How are transaction fees handled in each payout model?
PPS pools often exclude transaction fees from the fixed per‑share rate. PPLNS and PROP usually add the total transaction fees from the mined block into the reward pool before splitting shares. Solo miners keep every fee from the block they find.
Is solo mining ever profitable for a hobbyist?
For hobbyists with a single ASIC, solo mining is rarely profitable because the probability of finding a block is extremely low. Pooling your hashpower gives you a steadier stream of income and makes better use of electricity costs.
3 Responses
PPS looks solid-instant payouts and low fees, 👍
The article, while thorough, overlooks the tax implications of each payout model-an essential factor for many miners; moreover, it fails to address latency issues that arise with higher fee structures; still, the breakdown of PPS versus PPLNS is noteworthy, albeit presented in a somewhat generic tone.
When choosing a mining pool, the first decision revolves around the payout method, as it directly influences cash flow and risk tolerance.
Pay‑Per‑Share (PPS) offers predictable, instant rewards for each submitted share, effectively insulating miners from pool luck.
This stability comes at a cost, typically a 2‑5 % pool fee that compensates the operator for assuming variance.
Pay‑Per‑Last‑N‑Shares (PPLNS) distributes rewards based on the last N shares contributed before a block is found, which can lower fees to 0.5‑1 %.
However, PPLNS payouts are variable; miners may experience periods of low income during unlucky streaks.
The proportional (PROP) method allocates rewards proportionally to the amount of work each miner contributed during a round.
Because PROP fees can be as low as 0‑1 %, it appears attractive, yet it still suffers from the same variance issues as PPLNS.
Solo mining, by contrast, eliminates pool fees entirely and grants the full block reward to the miner who discovers a block.
The downside of solo mining is the extremely high variance and the necessity for substantial hash power to be realistic.
Beyond fee structures, network latency plays a crucial role; miners located far from the pool’s servers may experience delayed share submissions.
Delayed shares can effectively reduce a miner’s contribution, marginally decreasing their expected payout.
Additionally, transaction fees per block, while often small, should be factored into profitability calculations, especially for low‑margin pools.
Many calculators, like the one in the post, allow users to input custom transaction fees to get a more accurate estimate.
It is also wise to monitor pool reputation, as some pools employ hidden fees or suboptimal payout scripts.
Ultimately, the optimal pool aligns with a miner’s individual goals, whether they prioritize steady income, low fees, or maximum upside potential.